We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions

However, decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of your United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues from the Constitution and federal law.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as being a legally regarded conviction. Read more

thirteen . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some length, both parties have agreed to your disposal of the instant petition over the premise that the DIGP Malir will hear the petitioner together with private respondents and will just take care of every one of the components of the case and make certain that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and while in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in assist with the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is attained, the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it's effortless for your Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to get rid of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has achieved such stage. Read more

10. Without touching the merits with the case in the issue of yearly increases while in the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of the provincial government, these kinds of yearly increase, if permissible inside the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment being made by the court of website plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more

Article 27 from the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity while in the spend scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is inside the crystal clear negation of the regulation laid down via the Supreme Court in its different pronouncements. Read more

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the law laid down from the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority in the parent department of the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount from the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which He's entitled under the regulation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority with the respondent is also directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

The different roles of case legislation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as the case under appeal, perhaps overruling the previous case regulation by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This might happen several times given that the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth from the concept of estoppel starting from the High Trees case.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more